In 2014, High DPI support was improved, with .NET 4.5.2, reflecting the fact that this ancient framework is still widely used. At this point I’m not sure why you would use UWP, unless there is some special reason eg you want to run on HoloLens. However the ability to bind list and grid controls to any kind of .NET collection is fantastically useful. Microsoft introduced the concept for Windows 8.1. Windows: WPF, VS2015.3 for now It’s blazingly fast, powerful and makes some otherwise horrible jobs quite easy. DirectX, in particular Direct3D and DirectCompute (note that UWP also offers DirectX interop). Windows forms are not vector based UI. So, we in the Chem4Word more than a little wary of Microsoft’s push towards UWP. Too many products have been mothballed over the years and the amount of time developers have to spend troubleshooting a technical issues with the entire MS stack seems staggering to me as the years pass. But what about UWP? It take same time to create simple gui in Forms as in WPF? This platform is designed for desktop applications that require a sophisticated UI, styles customization, and graphics-intensive scenarios. https://deanchalk.com/microsoft-and-the-uwp-for-enterprise-delusion-f22fcbbe2757. of non vertical LOB in forms, delusional blowfication, typical b ig m outh blogger. After 25 years of using MS products, I’m very wary of any tech that is not yet fully established. The resulting project is well-formed, readable code that incorporates the latest Windows 10 features while implementing proven patterns and best practices. UWP is an evolution of the new application platform introduced in Windows 8 in 2012. 2 Although the platform lacks first-class API support for this scenario, developers can support this scenario with workarounds. For more information about Windows Forms, see the following articles: Using the Win32 API with C++ makes it possible to achieve the highest levels of performance and efficiency by taking more control of the target platform with unmanaged code than is possible on a managed runtime environment like WinRT and .NET. b1) What about blurry fonts and Vista? I find it hard to think of UWP apps that I love. There are reasons for each of them. and for F sake RDP, ever hear of WCF ? The app platform became UWP with the launch of Windows 10 in 2015. Too many choose WPF or UWP simply due to dis-information. And see the first, sympathetic comment at the end which is from Tim Sneath. For more information, see the following articles: The following table compares various characteristics of Windows Forms, WPF, and UWP in detail. .net floating point speed , ROFL Why is Windows Forms still in use? f) Windows will be for games. Telerik UI for WPF is quite a mature suite, it's already been developed for about 10 years, so, indeed, it offers all types of components that you'd need for building a powerful WPF app. did sinofsky and his tawtsquad try to undermine WPF, yep, This provides many benefits, especially in the areas of developer productivity, sophisticated and customizable UI, and application security. A conversion to the Universal Windows Platform (UWP) enables WPF .NET Framework apps to deploy to the Microsoft Store and conversion to Xamarin provides access to mobile app stores. Hardware-level optimizations, including tight control over resource allocation, object lifetimes, data layout, alignment, byte packing, and more. e) There is enough movement in the C/C++ world toward more modern. Here are a few highlights of what the Win32 API and C++ offers to enable you to build high-performance applications. He recently left Microsoft to go to Google where he is part of the group working on the mobile, web-based Flutter SDK/platform. For more information, see the Uno Platform docs. So we’ll return back to Winforms. Some of these platforms share some traits and are better suited for certain types of applications. Leaving aside your discourteous language, the truth is that there are many different levels of professional development from high-end commercial software to dull but important line of business applications; there are more people doing the latter of course. No DrawingVisuals, for instance. In particular, the Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), which is … Use Xamarin to build cross-platform applications for Windows 10 that can also run on iOS and Android. Centennial is meant to make classic Windows apps -Win32, .NET, COM- run on the Universal Platform. You do not explained what is not true in saying: The main issue is that the time you save on figuring out scaling is more than consumed by the time you spend on design.”. The rest of the ‘plumbing’ is the same as it is in WPF – data access, authentication etc. If there would be an award granted on a yearly basis for ‘If you cannot convince your ECO System, simply confuse them’ Microsoft would be the winner for almost 3 decades, without even a single break. It doesn’t change the code, it simply repackages the … Windows 10 also comes pre-installed with .NET Framework 4.6 which includes many new features including improvements in WPF and Windows Forms. The project titel was “Project Centennial” and a year later the tooling seems to be ok-ish. To supplement the main Windows app platforms, you can also use the Windows UI Library (WinUI) in your apps. Today, Microsoft's Universal Windows Platform (UWP) is about much more than truly modern universal applications. . However it appeared that Winforms are just nicer for the people. UWP still offers Store delivery and isolation from other applications, better for security and stability. WPF development skills are similar to UWP development skills, so migration from WPF to UWP apps is easier than migration from Windows Forms. We just can’t afford to give so much time to maintaining and troubleshooting the myriad of exceptions thrown in today’s applications. Windows Forms is still a big player in the enterprise space. You may have heard about Universal Windows Platform Applications, also known as UWP applications and wondered what they are. I am not a fan of this database framework, which quickly gets convoluted, but you do not have to use it. e) XAML (C++ and Javascript) is the next big thing ( Windows Template Studio is a Visual Studio 2019 Extension that accelerates the creation of new Universal Windows Platform (UWP) and WPF (.NET Core 3.1) apps using a wizard-based experience. Ya, I get it, but this is a metaphor for why UWP hasn’t taken off. Math and floating point speed are strongly tied together. , I send transcode 4k video in .Net and send it over WCF in real with a few lines of code, and And of course it’s very difficult in relation with winforms. For example, quick app for your desktop: Windows forms. When you want to create a new desktop application for Windows PCs, the first decision you make is which application platform to use. For example, both UWP and .NET have deep integration with Visual Studio. And then read about High DPI support, which was improved again in .NET Framework 4.7. b) WPF will replace Winforms and Winforms is dead. Even if the project does not require such an amount the suppliers simply play in that league today. For more information about UWP, see the following articles: WPF is the established platform for managed Windows applications with access to .NET Core or the full .NET Framework, and it also uses XAML markup to separate UI from code. WPF development skills are similar to UWP development skills, so migration from WPF to UWP apps is easier than migration from Windows Forms. So when a business comes to you and says, we want a new Windows application to do this or that, and presuming they do not care about mobile or Macs or access over the internet but just want something that runs on their internal network, what framework do you choose? Hi there, I am a WPF programmer for couple years now, I have enough experience on it, but after I installed Visual Studio 2015, I started having some kind of confusion, First there are windows forms projects (the usual thing), WPF projects (the thing I do best), then there are two new project types: WinRT and UWP (Universal Windows Platform). Windows forms are easier to use while developing the applications whereas WPF is little difficult to use as it requires good … In every programming language I’ve used from now to the dawn of 1985 I’ve been able to open a file and read it’s contents with a few lines of code. a great way to prove it go look at a blogger like mr asp core .NET and look at the old post of stating how this and that is dead and this or that is the future, it’s cost that jackass nothing to give one piece of bad advise after the other , he will still be big man VP at M$ and you’ll be screwed. Perhaps something like Power Apps will render this discussion irrelevant before long. Experience concerning the application of technologies is pretty dependent on the whether or not you want to grow a company, the domain, the processes and standards you will finally have to follow, … as well as the existing infrastructure found from where you get the data you want to visualize in an interactive fashion. killed WPF’s reputation? WPF (Windows Presentation Foundation) is a GUI oriented technology. Build beautiful transitions and visualizations using Blend’s full suite of vector drawing tools, powerful template editing features, real-time animation, visual state management, and more. M$ is pretty comparable to the ministry of silly walks. On the other hand, UWP is a newer platform (since Windows 10), so it's our UWP suite. A Universal App project in Visual Studio lets developers share code across multiple Windows devices such as PC, tablet and phone, using a feature called Portable Class Libraries to ensure that code conforms to the subset of the .NET Framework available on all the chosen targets. If Microsoft itself chose Electron (built on JavaScript and NodeJS) for the highly regarded Visual-Studio-Code Editor/proto-IDE, it makes me question my continued investment in any of WPF, UWP or Xamarin skills. Unlike Windows Forms, it is based on the DirectX graphics API, so great for multimedia and special effects. That said, Microsoft intended it to be replaced by Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF, see below), so it has not been a focus of attention. UWP apps can be .NET core apps, but the reverse is not necessarily true. Microsoft’s Universal Windows Platform offers code-once-run-anywhere upside, but development drawbacks abound. The Windows 8 app platform made sense to me as a way of bringing Windows into the tablet era and enabling applications that were more secure and more easily deployed, even if it tended to result in applications that were blocky and ugly. Then I had to do a program for a very similar machine and I pushed hard to change to WPF. The application model was also service based, the idea being that your app consumes services published over the internet. Both Windows Forms and WPF are old, and Microsoft is pointing developers towards its Universal Windows Platform (UWP) instead. did it work, only on the dabblers wannabes, just take a look at all the high paying WPF jobs all over the world, the try to get a position in “compiler and designing programming languages and math totally independent from the technology.”, Basically, I’m about to retire and that’s my light at the end of the tunnel. The Ballad of Mott the Hoople and Ian Hunter, https://deanchalk.com/microsoft-and-the-uwp-for-enterprise-delusion-f22fcbbe2757, https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/dn614993(v=vs.85), Delphi Blogs of the Month #59 - Blog - Developer Tools - IDERA Community, Desktop Development on Windows and Delphi VCL Library - Blog - Developer Tools - IDERA Community. I personally hate the ‘new; way of architecting fullscreen apps, and I don’t like theOffice 365 versions of Office. only with the ignorant, and speaking of TwoPaneView is fully working, but might have issues on Windows X, as the necessary APIs there to do screen spanning are not yet exposed. When it comes to building a desktop application for Windows PC, you have to choose from Universal Windows Platform (UWP), Windows Presentation Foundation(WPF) , Windows Forms (WinForms) and Win32. Every time I look at UWP I can never figure out why I would want to use it. Designing using the technology mix mentioned is about growing companies into levels where you can very quickly face competition from others who simply hold a banking license. Others might also be interested in Dean Chalk’s recent post: As of WinUI 3 (still in preview), WinUI is growing in scope to become the premier native user interface (UI) framework for Windows 10 apps across UWP, .NET, and Win32 app platforms. Is high-resolution audio (like SACD) audibly better than than CD? Data binding to controls also seems more natural in WPF allowing to design in some real flexibility (less hard coded processes) to how the machine operates. Of course, I’m working in a large enterprise with a network topology consisting of no less than 700 servers, with Win 7 and Win 10 clients across 6 states. NOTE: This is mostly a work in progress. Windows Forms is a nice wrapper around the Windows API, and easy to use in that it uses essentially X Y layout. Real Windows architecture is always the best for real Windows development, meaning Winforms, ActiveXs, MFC, VCLs, etc. Create engaging and tailored user interfaces for Universal Windows apps with Blend for Visual Studio, the premier professional design tool for XAML apps. You’re being much too ideological! c) WPF and Silverlight are the next big things So it depends on your requirements. Given the demise of LightSwitch and the constant change of UWP, I think many developers are wary of locking into a Microsoft framework. UWP is an evolution of the new application platform introduced in Windows 8 in 2012. Both Windows Forms and WPF are old, and Microsoft is pointing developers towards its Universal Windows Platform (UWP) instead. A customer who needs such software needs a supplier who is in the position and trustworthy enough to handle million dollar project volumes. The Uno Platform enables Windows UWP-based code (C# and XAML) to run on iOS, Android, macOS, Linux and WebAssembly. 4 months ago I finished programming a Human Machine Interface in WinForms. Not helpful. The power of WPF lies beyond the shiny world of the components found in the Visual Studio or provided by third-party vendors. Not only can you use UWP to create desktop applications for Windows PCs, but UWP is also the only supported platform for Xbox, HoloLens, and Surface Hub applications. For a real world example, download our canned demo that includes MFC, Winforms, and WPF variations of the same demo. Second, like WPF it is a designer-centric platform and not so good for running up quick business applications. A set of WPF Controls ported from Windows Universal apps / WinUI. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. if you want to talk about mundane functional that’s fine , but don’t kid yourself or others, there has never been any world class killer Xplat app, PERIOD. From the technical perspective you are totally right. Windows Forms is still a very relevant decision for enterprise apps with requirements as you mention. The young developer you mentioned will be better off educating him or herself in the area of computer graphics and parallel computing as well as compiler and designing programming languages and math totally independent from the technology. Your existing code bases are .NET Standard compliant, Support for multiple input types across Windows devices (including touch, pen, gamepad, mouse, and keyboard), Support for Xbox, HoloLens, IoT or Surface Hub, Modern accessibility support (such as screen readers), Rich text data capabilities (such as built-in spell check), Secure execution via application containers (for example, untrusted content is sandboxed), Large collection of controls from Microsoft and partners, Some Windows Runtime APIs require specific minimum versions of Windows 10, Full platform support and shell integration (for example, UWP currently doesn't support System Tray integration or full access to all devices), Existing code-base class libraries that use non-.NET Standard or non-Windows App Certification Kit compliant APIs, Local network loopback support (that is, if your app needs to communicate with localhost without creating a loopback exemption on the target device), Rich graphics and user experiences (such as touch and animations), Rich abstraction of views and data models.